Key takeaways
- Kids should help at home: the American Academy of Pediatrics says helping keep the home running boosts self-esteem and teaches children to cooperate as part of a team. You can’t force motivation, though – you have to build it.
- Nagging backfires: the AAP calls badgering or scolding ineffective, and pressure tends to produce resistance. Self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci) names three needs that carry motivation – autonomy, competence and relatedness.
- In practice: offer choices (which chore, when), show instead of redoing, and frame chores as a shared project rather than an order. What motivates shifts with age – from joining in at 3 to owning a whole area at 14.
- When nothing works, use consequences without punishment: set the order instead of threatening, the chore stays on the list, and the allowance stays untouched.
“Can you empty the dishwasher, please?” – “In a minute.” Ten minutes later: “I said empty the dishwasher!” – “I said in a minute!” If you know this dialogue, you know that the real question is rarely whether kids should help at home. It is how to get kids to do chores without nagging every single evening. This guide answers the first question briefly and the second in detail – with three levers from motivation research, a table by age, phrases that help and hurt, and a plan for the days when nothing works.
Should kids have to do chores? Yes – and here’s why it pays off
The short answer: yes. Children who live in a household are part of the team that keeps it running, and the question is not whether but how much. Which chores fit which age is in the age-appropriate chores chart.
More important is what helping does for a child. The American Academy of Pediatrics puts it plainly: helping to keep the home running smoothly boosts a child’s self-esteem, and chores teach children how to cooperate with a group – their family. Add the everyday skills – laundry, groceries, cooking – that young adults otherwise learn under pressure when they move out.
Why nagging doesn’t work
Nagging is the most natural reaction to a child who doesn’t help – and the strategy with the worst track record. The AAP is direct about it: badgering or scolding a child is not an effective way to build responsibility. The reason lies in a mechanism that is especially strong in children: the more pressure someone feels, the harder they defend their freedom to decide – if necessary by not doing the very thing they were asked to do. Psychologists call this reactance. The child who says “in a minute” is not negotiating about the dishwasher. They are negotiating about who is in charge.
The second reason is what nagging does to the chore itself. A task that always comes with complaints becomes unpleasant in its own right. The AACAP adds a point parents often miss: be a role model – children pick up chores more easily when they see the rest of the family doing the same.
What works instead has been well described for decades. The self-determination theory of psychologists Richard Ryan and Edward Deci names three basic psychological needs that must be met for people to do something out of their own drive: autonomy, competence and relatedness. Translated to chores, those are three levers.
How to get kids to do chores: autonomy, competence, belonging
Autonomy: offer a choice
Autonomy does not mean your child decides whether to help. It means they decide how. Two chores to choose from instead of one order: “Dishwasher or trash – which one is yours?” A time window instead of a moment: “Before dinner” instead of “right now”. For teenagers, a whole area instead of single steps: “Your laundry is your job from now on.”
The difference is huge for your child and barely noticeable for you: the job gets done, only the decision about when and which is theirs.
Competence: show, don’t redo
Competence means your child experiences that they can do it. That takes two things. First, instructions that fit their age. The AACAP recommends telling your child exactly what needs to be done – “please take out the trash from the kitchen after breakfast”. “Empty the dishwasher” is a riddle for a 7-year-old; “glasses on the top shelf, plates in the left cabinet” is a task. Do it together two or three times, then alone. Second – and this is the harder part – no redoing. If you smooth the bed again behind your child, you are telling them their work doesn’t count. A child whose work doesn’t count stops working.
Competence also needs an ending: your child has to notice that the job is finished and was seen – a check on the list, a quick “Thanks, the table’s done”.
Families build exactly this ending into Pepp for extra jobs: your child marks a quest as done – with a photo as proof, if you set it up that way – you see the result and approve it, and the agreed reward goes into their pot, a counter in the app. If the proof isn’t good enough, you send it back; your child only adds new proof, the chore itself doesn’t count as undone. This is not meant for basic responsibilities – those stay unpaid and run on a board or a list – but for extra jobs it replaces checking and redoing with a photo and a check mark.
Belonging: together, not delegated
The third need is the one most often overlooked. Children help when they feel their help is needed and appreciated – not “I have to do this for Mom” but “we’re getting this done together”. With little ones, that means joining in: a 4-year-old sets the table more happily when you are getting the glasses next to them. With older children, it means embedding the chore in a shared goal: “On Saturday we all clean for an hour, then we go to the pool” – an hour in which everyone works, parents included.
Belonging has a flip side: if you permanently hand the unpopular chore to one child while the others are free, you put that child outside the group. Rotate chores regularly so everyone gets a turn at everything. How to organize that for the whole family is shown in the family chore chart template.
Example
The Lindners argued with Jake (10) about emptying the dishwasher for months – the same discussion every morning. Then they changed three things. Jake gets to choose: dishwasher in the morning or trash in the evening (autonomy). He no longer gets reminders; the chore is on the board with a time, and his parents stop correcting him when the mugs end up on the wrong shelf (competence). And on Saturdays everyone tidies together for half an hour, followed by pancakes (belonging). Jake picks the trash. In the first two weeks his mother reminds him three times, then not at all. After six weeks Jake asks whether he can swap the trash for the dishwasher – it’s “actually faster”.
Pepp
Chores become quests
Create a chore, attach a reward, photo as proof. Your child sees what needs doing – you don't have to say it five times.
What motivates at each age
What drives a child shifts noticeably between 3 and 14. The table shows which lever works best at which age – and what is especially demotivating then.
| Age | What motivates | What demotivates |
|---|---|---|
| 3–5 | Joining in, real jobs (not pretend ones), immediate feedback on the result, rituals (a “table song”) | Waiting, vague tasks (“clean up”), redoing the job in front of the child |
| 6–9 | A choice between two chores, visible check-offs on a board or in an app, a small fixed role (“you’re in charge of the table”), showing instead of explaining | Comparisons with siblings, inspections, chores without a fixed time |
| 10–13 | Owning a whole area, a say in the family meeting, swapping chores every few months, an agreed reward for real extra jobs | Nagging, “because I said so”, chores as punishment, pay for basic responsibilities |
| 14+ | Responsibility without inspection (“by Sunday night, whenever you like”), jobs that show adult skills (cooking, groceries, repairs), negotiating the scope | Detailed control, kids’ stickers, chores nobody else in the family does |
Rewards only appear in the table from 10, and only for extra jobs. That is deliberate: younger children respond more to choice, visible progress and a fixed role than to pay. Paying for basic responsibilities buys you quiet in the short term and the question “What do I get for it?” in the long term. What makes a good reward is covered in should kids get paid for chores; how to build a reward chart that makes itself unnecessary after a few weeks, in its own guide.
Seven phrases that help – and seven that backfire
Motivation is often decided in one sentence. The left column strengthens autonomy, competence or belonging; the right column hurts one of the three – and so creates resistance.
| Helps | Backfires |
|---|---|
| “Dishwasher or trash – which one do you want?” | “Empty the dishwasher right now.” |
| “Any time before dinner.” | “How many times do I have to tell you?” |
| “The table’s set – now everyone can eat.” | “Finally. That took forever.” |
| “Show me how you do it.” | “Never mind, I’ll do it faster myself.” |
| “On Saturday we’re all doing this together.” | “You’re the only one here who never helps.” |
| “Sure you can go to Ben’s – once your room is done.” | “If your room isn’t done, no allowance.” |
| “Thanks. That really helped me.” | “Look at your sister, she does it without arguing.” |
Most parents say the right-hand ones sometimes; what matters is that the left ones are more frequent. The allowance phrase does the most damage: it turns allowance into leverage and helping into a deal – see the allowance rules for why.
Tip
Praise what your child did, not who they are. “The bathroom looks really clean” and “You stuck with it even though it was boring” show your child what they achieved; “You’re such a good girl” judges the person and quickly feels like manipulation to older children. The AAP likewise recommends honest praise for the effort in each task.
When nothing works: consequences without punishment
There are days and phases – often around 12 to 14 – when none of the three levers works. Your child refuses, argues or ignores. Then you need consequences, but not punishments. The difference: a punishment adds something unpleasant that has nothing to do with the chore (grounding, cutting allowance, taking the phone). A consequence only sets the order – the chore stays, and the fun comes after. The AAP suggests consequences such as revoking certain privileges or special activities; the mildest form is holding them back until the chore is done. That works best when the order was agreed in advance, not in the heat of an argument.
- Check whether the chore fits. Too hard, too vague, too often, at the wrong time? A 12-year-old asked to empty the dishwasher at 7 a.m. before school isn’t refusing out of laziness.
- Repeat the agreement calmly – once. “We agreed: trash before dinner.” No justification, no discussion, no third reminder. Arguing signals that the agreement is up for negotiation.
- Set the order, don’t threaten. “As soon as the trash is out, you can go to Ben’s.” That is not a punishment but the order that applies to adults too – and the path to the fun stays open.
- Don’t do the chore yourself. If you quietly take out the trash in the end, your child learns that waiting it out works. The chore stays until your child does it.
- Leave the allowance out of it. Allowance is paid unconditionally; it is not a discipline tool. Cutting it wins you one evening and costs the reliability your child needs to plan.
- Revisit it later – not in the argument. If a chore hasn’t worked for weeks, it belongs in the next family meeting: what’s the problem, which chore would your child rather take on? Sometimes a swap is the whole solution.
Conclusion
Should kids have to do chores? Yes – and what they learn about themselves along the way matters more than any empty dishwasher. Whether they do them, though, is decided not by volume but by whether three needs are met: autonomy (offer choices), competence (show, don’t redo) and belonging (together, not delegated). Which lever works best shifts with age – from joining in at 3 to ownership at 14. And when nothing works, a punishment won’t help, but an order will: chore first, fun second. The allowance stays out of it.
Frequently asked questions
How do I motivate a 6-year-old to help?
By joining in and making progress visible. Most 6-year-olds still want to help when the job is small, concrete and shared: “You do the plates, I’ll do the glasses.” Let your child choose between two chores, show them two or three times, and check off finished jobs where everyone can see them – on a board or in an app. Describing what was done (“The table is set, everyone can eat”) works better than labeling the child (“You’re such a good helper”).
How do I motivate a teenager?
Through ownership, not control. A 14-year-old doesn’t want to be told when to clean the bathroom – they want it done by Sunday night, whenever suits them. Hand over whole areas instead of single steps (their own laundry, one dinner a week), negotiate the scope in a family meeting and skip the inspection. For extra jobs beyond basic responsibilities, an agreed reward makes sense at this age.
Should I reward kids for doing chores?
Not for basic responsibilities like their room, the table or their own laundry – paying for those suggests that nothing needs doing without money. Extra jobs that go beyond the basics, which your child would not do otherwise, can earn a reward in money or screen time. Draw the line between the two once and don’t renegotiate it case by case.
What if one child helps and the other doesn’t?
First check whether the chores fit each child’s age – often the older one does more because they can do more, and the younger one looks lazy when they are simply overwhelmed. Then the same rule applies to both: chore first, fun second. Don’t compare (“Look how your sister does it”) – it won’t motivate one and puts pressure on the other. Rotating chores every few months ends the fight over the unpopular job.
When should kids do chores without being reminded?
Expect four to six weeks before a new chore becomes routine, at any age. From around 8 or 9, a child can handle a fixed chore on a fixed day without prompting if the time is clear (“after dinner”) and the chore is visible. Completely reminder-free usually comes at 12 or 13 – and even then only for chores your child sees as their own.
Pepp
Try it free for 7 days
One price for the whole family, cancel anytime. No ads, no payment data from your child.
About the author
Was this guide helpful?
Thanks for your feedback!
Sources
- Ryan & Deci (2000) – Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being (American Psychologist, PDF)
- American Academy of Pediatrics, HealthyChildren.org – Age-Appropriate Chores for Children
- American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry – Chores and Children (Facts for Families No. 125)
Editorial note: figures and recommendations were checked against the primary sources linked here (legal texts, professional bodies, youth services). This guide is not legal or medical advice.
